Related topics

ATI Rage XL Removal
Naturally, this is complicated by all sorts of other considerations that improve speed in 24-bits, such as the fact that a "multiply by three" logic is not difficult to achieve, and so often a 24-bit graphic mode is faster than a 32-bit graphic mode, or other considerations that improve speed in 32-bits,

Further HDTV Considerations
That's why i'm just interested in these two choices. If 3d performance with the ATI card is better in D3D than with my voodoo 1 i'll get the 3d card. If it is not, i'll get the DVD decoder card and stick with my voodoo 1 without brining any other video card considerations into this. Can anyone offer any advice?

comm central conflict message to ponder- large msg here ...
Video Cards with the MACH32 Chipset ATI VGA Wonder GT ATI Graphics Ultra Plus ATI Graphics Ultra Pro ATI VIMA08.ZIP 1866 06.02.95 IBM-FAX: SETTING ADAPTERS WITH THE MACH8 CHIPSET TO EMULATE THE 8514, USING THE IBM 8514 DRIVERS VIBAS.ZIP 1483 06.02.95 IBM-FAX: Considerations handling Display problems PRWPRO.

ATI Rage 128 with K6-2 300?
yahoo.com> wrote: Winegard SquareShooter 35 miles from Mt Wilson in 90274, split 4 ways to 3 ATI HDTV Wonders in 3 Athlon XP machines each with 500 gig They all run ATI Multimedia center 9.14 and are networked with a Linksys router with Cat 5 cable. Any computer can record HD while sourcing 2 HD feeds to the

OpenGL accelerator for Win2000SP2: Hercules Prophet II/III or ...
Of course, in the GUI world, there are other considerations. Yes, you can run kate in gnome, or gedit in KDE, but doing so requires a mess of support libraries; if one doesn't want that overhead, one needs a "native" editor, meaning that even if kate and gedit are functionally identical, there is justification for

What new video card/video capture Options
Fellow simmers, ATI has a new card out called "ATI Fury" It has, 128Bit 3D Graphics 32MB Memory 1920x1200 Max Res Refresh Rates up to 200Hz Supports TV Tuner If anybody has any experience with this card or believes it will perform exceptionally well with FS98 please drop me a note as it is one of my considerations

Further HDTV Considerations
If you want the least expensive route to good game performance and AVI performance, then I'd recommend an ATI card. If cost and 3D games are both critical considerations then the Diamond Stealth II S220, selling for less than $100 US, as noted by Gabriel, above, works ok for general purposes and outperforms

Athlon help, warning .. this is posted in HTML for formatting ...
Obviously , you are far too young to remember the last Ati new-chip-architecture driver fiasco. When the 9700 came out, it took the best part of a year for Ati to output scan-converter/anti-alias filter so that you can set your display resolution to taste and totally independent of any in-game considerations.

ati graphics pro turbo
Considerations: 1. Want to run XFree sometime soon. 2. Want to run OS/2 3. Want the best available card for < $400 I'm looking at the ATI Pro Turbo and the #9GXE64, and need help deciding which. Since I'm assuming that there will be XFree drivers for both cards sometime soon, and since both cards come with OS/2

Does anyone actually have an R8500 that has 400mhz RAMDAC?
If you up the depth complexity you will need even more power and the Rage II barely squeaks in under the line as it is. BTW the 3dfx pumps 45million pixels/sec on a Pentium 90. As for any ram considerations, anything under 4 megs is useless for 640x480 in 3d. I think the rage II uses funny resolutions...512x384 i

ATI GX MACH 64 and Video Capture Cards
The only other consideration is the ATI GPT. If anyone has had experience with these two cards, please post or mail me. Reasons for the Hercules: High refresh rates (higher than the GPT???) Fast in Windows (versus GPT???) Relatively fast in DOS (same) Reasons for the ATI: Awesome drivers (wow!

Around OS/2 praesentiert [184/191]
Is there a capture card that does work with the ATI GX MACH 64 in a video mode higher then 640x480 16 colors, please tell me. The Feature Connector won't work in any accellerated video modes due to hardware considerations. You will most likely have this problem with any accelrated vram video card and with video

DVD Recorder / VHS Capture Advice For UK (longish)
There are serious memory bandwidth considerations here - 750000 pixels, each 8 bytes (4 bytes colour, 4 Z-buffer/stencil, aligned), 35 times a second. The memory bandwidth of the R128 is barely higher than the .35u TNT (atually the R128 looks almost the same as the TNT WAS going to be at a higher clock - 100Mhz

ATI SUCKS!!!! DO NOT BUY ATI PRODUCTS OR YOU'LL BE SORRY ...
Shawk sh...@clara.co.uk.3guesses alt comp periphs videocards ati "cryotiger" <richardgla...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1134485283.777391.258710@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... Ok, after further searching I found this in the Adapter Considerations section of the IBM xSeries 225 Types 8649 Hardware

ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
ATI multimedia center runs under Win XP. I'm too lazy to get a Linux box up and running so I get along quite happily with Win XP. If I can make it work, ANYBODY can do it. I have located the ATI website and I will take a close look. The HD capability is what interests me. Also the MPEG4 interests me.

Front Projection considerations?
A...@sybase.com> y...@sybase.com (Xudong Yan) writes: ...I don't know is that whether [my house] preferences make sound investment sense. For example, I wanted an older house with a yard, rather than a "zero size lot". But I've heard that older homes are difficult to sell later on (here 20 year old means old ).

WC - speed considerations
ATI lists 4 other series of PCI Express cards that are higher perfomance than the X300. Note that there is no computer that I am aware that incorporates the ability to use both the AGP and the PCI Express 16 cards. It is an "either or" situation. So if your computer supports PCI Express 16 then your considerations

Front Projection considerations?
ATI mobility radeon or NVidia mobility - no onboard graphics. I would like a 14.1" screen, the higher qaulity the better. 1024MB DDR-SDRAM, why? because more is better! wireless of some kind, my school supports A/B/G, I'd like a card that also supports all three for maximum portability. I assume I can buy a pcmcia

BSP rendering: Material considerations
Wait for the Xbox2, which will have a very sophisticated output scan-converter/anti-alias filter so that you can set your display resolution to taste and totally independent of any in-game considerations. 1) Xbox2 specs have been published? 2) Why on earth would you put anti-aliasing in a device meant to display on

ATI Rage XL Removal
Just as ATI thought they had got one over nVidia by releasing their next generation chip earlier, the well documented ATI reliability seems to have struck again. If you decide to run one, I'd suggest making some considerations for effective cooling first. It is too hot to run in a ducted case for sure.